May 15, 2013
Reducing the Pain: IRS Penalty Mitigation Practice and Procedure
- May 15, 2013
- Publication: Maryland Bar Journal
- Related Attorneys: Paul Marcotte, Jr.
- Related Practice Areas: Tax: Business, Tax: Individual
A Primer on How to Assist Clients in Avoiding or Seeking Abatement of Federal Civil Tax Penalties Based on Reasonable Cause
A taxpayer is generally entitled to relief from civil penalties when a taxpayer, despite acting reasonably under the circumstances, incurs penalties relating to either failing to pay a tax on or before its due date and/or filing a required return after its due date. Penalties may also be assessed for "understating taxes", "accuracy related penalties", or fraud. A multitude of circumstances exist that could be the basis for requesting and achieving abatement of penalties; however, there are certain defined categories, as outlined in the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM), that will entitle a taxpayer to an abatement if the taxpayer can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Internal Revenue Service ("Service") and, in some cases, to a Court's satisfaction, that it acted reasonably under the circumstances. In other words, despite a taxpayer's best efforts, it was unable to comply due to circumstances beyond its control. The term of art for such reasonable failures to comply is reasonable cause.
I R M Part 20.1 is the "Penalty Handbook" . Available at www.irs.gov/irm, it is the starting point for the Service's consideration of a taxpayer's request for abatement. I R M 220.127.116.11 lays out the criteria for relief from penalties and is broken down into four categories under which the Service wil l grant relief: (1) Reasonable Cause; (2) Statutory exceptions; (3) Administrativ e Waivers; and (4) Correction of Service Error. IRS Appeals can also recommend the non-assertion of a penalty based on hazards of litigation. This article wil l examine the reasonable cause exception and the circumstances that can give rise to a taxpayer obtaining relief. (Please note that a ful l discussion of all reasonable cause exceptions including extensive judicia l authorities is beyond the scope of this article). We wil l address the most commonly used exceptions, in our experience, but wil l list all of them here for your convenience: Ordinary Business Care and Prudence (IRM . 18.104.22.168.2.2); Death, Serious Illness, or Unavoidabl e Absence (IRM 22.214.171.124.2.2.1); Eire, Casualty, Natura l Disaster, or Other Disturbance (IRM 126.96.36.199.2.2.2); Unable to Obtain Records (IRM 188.8.131.52.2.2.3); Mistake was Mad e (IRM 184.108.40.206.2.2.4); Erroneous Advic e or Relianc e (IR M 220.127.116.11.2.2.5); Ignorance of the La w (IRM 18.104.22.168.2.2.6); Forgetfulness (IRM 22.214.171.124.2.2.7); and Undu e Hardship (IRM 126.96.36.199.3.3)).
Before delving deeper into what constitutes reasonable cause, it is noteworthy that penalties incurred for first time non-compliance are routinely abated upon request. I R M 188.8.131.52.6.1. This procedure is known as Eirst Time Abate (ETA) 32 MARYLAND BAR JOURNAL May 2013 and it applies to taxpayers who have not incurred penalties in the prior three years, except the estimated tax penalty. "Reasonable cause relief is generally granted when the taxpayer exercised ordinary business care and prudence in determining their tax obligations but nevertheless failed to comply wit h those obligations." IR M 184.108.40.206.2. We are therefore operating i n the ubiquitous realm of the reasonable person standard; however, it is important to convey to the Service that individu - als faced wit h dire circumstances are rarely capable of acting as a reasonable person woul d absent those circumstances.
"Reasonable cause is based on all the facts and circumstances in each situation and allows the IRS to provide relief from a penalty that woul d otherwise be assessed." Hence, reasonable cause can be available, theoretically, i n an infinite number of different factual scenarios so long as the IRS is convinced that a taxpayer's actions constitute reasonable cause under the given circumstances.
January 22, 2019
Paley Rothman is pleased to announce that Geonard Butler II and Robert Goodis have both joined its Family Law and Litigation practice groups as Associates.Read More
New law changes method of calculating size for small businesses.Read More
Paley Rothman shares this library of resources with clients and friends of the firm to help them stay ahead of legal and business developments and trends. Here, you will find helpful tips and tools written by our attorneys and relevant to our areas of practice.Read More